Utter Non-Sense

We remain victims of continuity.
The idea that what happens happens, that an experience remains and persists as percieved, once it has ended, is what keeps us tied to identity, life, death, ideas, religion, relationships etc. Our twin senses of history and responsibility are neccesary to be considered sentient and therefore "alive" beyond simple mechanics.
We are sympathetic through memory with our past selves, pressed to unify past experience with current perception for the sake of reassurance of our own continued survival.
Awareness of the past breeds fear of the future. Present perceptions feed the storehouses of the soul and inform our hypothetical decision based progression (i.e. future).
But is that enough?
Where would we get our uncertainty if we could see into the future as we do the pasts. If they were both visible wouldn't both be definable as "the past"? If we could see bi-latteraly out from our vantage point would both sets be equal? Thus making us president over a visible continuum informing our sense of self.
How does that definition differ from the present truth? We veiw an equal set of occurance, president over the continuum informing our sense of self.
Thus, are we omniscient?
"All seeing" is only definable by the confines of "entirety."
Does the fact that we are continuosly discovering more suggest that we cannot see it all?